Presenter: Anshula Chowdhury <email@example.com>,
DOBSON produced these notes. They're terrible!
Office in Vancouver
Framework to get measures across 1000s of organizations?
Scalability – client decreasing cost and increasing capacity.
Ontario Trillium Foundations. – numbers are exploding. 1500 orgs
Alternative credit – microfinance –
Started with non-profits, but we’re opposed to
One of the major pieces: Does one size fit all orgs? One taxonomy and benchmarking?
Answer: Not possible at this point in time. Haven’t figured out what the standard would look like yet.
Monetized social return. Unmonitized impact. Outcomes reporting – not necessarily causal.
Report on outcomes “We did 30 workshops” .. doesn’t provide an impact assessment.
Different sectors people work in (e.g. Arts and Culture)
SABITA – in-house database.
Social return on investment (SRI network created it). Developed by a bunch of people. Open source framework. Different levels of reporting. The type of report that comes out depends on the type of data you’ve got.
IV for variables. – academic theoretical literature for these indicators.
Not the solution for the entire market. There will be orgs for
Need to have more specialization in reporting.
Antony: Gold standard – shape and drive B-lab and GISR – Natural step impact on reporting
AU Question from a design perspective. How to design a strongly sustainable business. If they follow the AU advice, can the results cause a good result on the gold standard.
Indicators (not metrics) – how do they map to the design principles.
Does the framework apply to small or large firms? AU: It applies to all. Focus on small orgs. Methodology work. Push off to Mozol group – mutual presentation on Friday. SLS program presentation
Monthly Meetings >